Description of this paper

Individual Behavior Assignment




Individual Behavior Assignment (40 Points Total8% of Your Grade);Instructions;Complete the Personal Insights: Whats My Basic Personality? questionnaire on page 294 of;the custom edition of your text. Using the Analysis and Interpretation section (pp. 294-295);calculate/determine your dominant personality type (i.e., which of the five dimensions did you;score extremely high or low oni.e., a 15 on the extraversion dimension suggesting you are an;extravert OR a 3 on that same scale suggesting you are an introvert). If you do not feel;comfortable sharing your actual scores on these dimensions with me, it is acceptable to just state;that you scored high, moderate, or low on a dimension. If more than one dimension stood out;with a very high or low score and you want to discuss multiple dimensions that is encouraged. If;you scored in the moderate range on all five dimensions, just pick one and discuss it. Discuss;your personality type and whether or not it fits well with your current job/occupation. If you are;not currently working, discuss which type of job/occupation would be a good match for your;personality. Use references related to personality and job/occupation/career/etc. to support your;discussion. Cite your references within your discussion and include the full citations for your;references on your Reference page at the end of your document, following the APA Guidelines;that I provided you in Doc Sharing. Submit your completed assignment to the appropriate;dropbox. This assignment is due by 1:00 PM on November 4, 2014. The following rubric will be;used to grade your assignment.;I will consider;how detailed your;discussion is and;how far into depth;you go.;Far Exceeds;Standards;Thoroughly;discusses and;evaluates the;personality;dimension(s);providing;convincing and;supported;arguments.;Exceeds;Standards;Discusses and;evaluates the;personality;dimension(s);providing supported;arguments, but;could have gone;into a bit more;depth.;Discusses and;evaluates the;personality;dimension(s);providing supported;arguments, but;could have gone;into much more;depth.;Score;(18-20);(16-17);(14-15);Reference;Support;Research from;multiple journal;articles provided;strong support for;the discussion.;Several of the;journal articles;used came from;top-tier journals.;Research from;journal articles;provided support for;most of the;discussion. More;references could;have been used;and more could;have come from;top-tier journals.;Several parts of the;discussion lacked;strong support from;the research;presented in journal;articles. Most of the;articles came from;lower-level journals.;Fails to support the;knowledge associated;with issue at hand.;The few articles that;were used came from;low-level journals or;websites.;Score;(18-20);(16-17);(14-15);(0-13);Total Score;out of 40;Depth and;Quality of;Discussion;Meets Standards;Fails to Meet;Standards;Fails to discuss and;evaluate the;personality;dimension(s), does not;provide convincing or;supported arguments;lacks a significant;degree of depth.;(0-13);The more;reference support;you use, the;better. The;quality of the;journals is also;important.;View Full Attachment;Individual Behavior Assignment PG 294-295.pdf Download Attachment;Additional Requirements;Level of Detail: Only answer needed


Paper#17578 | Written in 18-Jul-2015

Price : $17