Details of this Paper

There are two identical rm which are playing the innite horizon Bertrand

Description

solution

Question

1. There are two identical rm which are playing the innite horizon Bertrand;game in a market with the inverse demand function p = 16 3q. Firms marginal cost;of production is constant and equal to 4. The discount factor for the rms is the same;and equal to =.6.;a. What is the monopoly price, quantity and prot?;b. Using grim trigger strategy show that there is a SPNE for this game where they;always set the price equal to the monopoly price.;Now suppose there is a informational lag for the price change. In particular, think about;a situation in which a price change would not be observed (and therefore) punished by;the opponent until three periods after.;c. Show that in this case there is no SPNE for this game in which all rms set the price;equal to monopoly price at all the periods.;d. Why collusion is not possible here? Give your intuition.;Go back to the situation with no informational lag, but now suppose there are three;identical rms in the market who are playing Bertrand game.;e. Show that there is no SPNE for this game in which all the rms set the price equal;to the monopoly price at all the periods.;f. Why tacit collusion is possible in the rst case but not in the second? Interpret.;2. Consider innite horizon Bertrand game with market uctuation. So all the;assumptions which was introduced on the class is satised. In particular, rms nd out;the state of the market at the beginning of each period.;There are two rms in the market 1, 2. There are to states for the market which;are translated in two dierent inverse demand functions: p1 = 10 2q, and 10 4q.;Both rms have discount factor =.6.;a. Find out in which state market is in a better condition by comparing the monopoly;prot for these two markets.;b. Show that if the state of the market was always good, then using a grim trigger;strategy will imply a SPNE in which rms set the price equal to monopoly price.;c. Show that if the state of the market was always bad, then using a grim trigger;strategy will imply a SPNE in which rms set the price equal to monopoly price.;d. Show that there is no SPNE of this game in which game use monopoly price at all;the periods.;e. Intuitively explain why collusion is not achievable in the presence of uctuation in;the market?

Paper#18201 | Written in 18-Jul-2015

Price : \$27