#### Details of this Paper

##### MGSC 625 Problem 15-14

Description

solution

Question

Unformatted Question, please see the attachement for the original question;MGSC 625 Problem 15-14 15-24 Case 2.4, Case 3-1;Problem 15-14;Period 1 2 3 4 5;Demand 20 40 30 10 45;Co = 100 per order Avg. demand/period, d= 29;Cc = \$1 per unit per cabinet period;L4L Rule Used.;Item X LLC: Periods Periods;L4L LT =1 1 2 3 4 5;Gross Requirements 20 40 30 10 45;Scheduled Receipts 0 0 0 0 0;Projected on hand--25 5 0 0 0 0;Net requirements 0 35 30 10 45;Planned order receipts 35 30 10 45;Planned order releases 35 30 10 45;Cost of L4L \$ 310.00 Ordering + Carrying Cost;EOQ Lot sizing;Item X LLC: Periods Periods;EOQ LT =1 1 2 3 4 5;Gross Requirements 20 40 30 10 45;Scheduled Receipts 0;Projected on hand--25 5 41 11 1 32;Net requirements 0 35 0 10 44;Planned order receipts 76 0 76;Planned order releases 76 76 0 76;EOQ = 87 Formula EOQ = SQRT(2*d*Co/Cc);Cost = \$ 406.00;POQ Rule.;POQ= 3.00 Rounded to 2. Formula used is EOQ/Avg. Demand, d.;Produce to take care of two periods at a time.;Total Planned receipt= Total gross reqmnts-on-hand= 30;Item X LLC: Periods Periods;POQ =2 LT =1 0 1 2 3 4 5;Gross Requirements 0 20 40 30 10 45;Scheduled Receipts;Projected on hand-- 25 70 30 0 45 0;Net requirements 65 0 0 10 0;Planned order receipts 65 0 55;Planned order releases 65 55;Planned order size is the sum of planned order receipt for 2 consecutive weeks.;Cost= \$ 248.00;POQ lot sizing is the cheapest approach.;Attachments;MGSC_625E1_Assignment_10.xls (36.5 KB)

Paper#20222 | Written in 18-Jul-2015

Price : \$32