Details of this Paper

UMUC BGMT365 final project

Description

solution


Question

Hide Folder Information;Folder;Final Project;Instructions;Final Project (35%);In the final project, students will complete the case study provided. In the final project, students will write a leadership plan that will provide a comprehensive analysis applying concepts learned throughout the course.;By completing this assignment, student will meet the following outcomes;use leadership theories, assessment tools, and an understanding of the role of ethics, values, and attitudes to evaluate and enhance personal leadership skills;develop and implement strategies that establish constructive interpersonal and group relationships that build high-performing and loyal individuals and teams;evaluate the culture and policies of an organization to recommend and implement improvements that support its vision, success, and sustainability;assess the interactions between the external environment and the organization to foster responsible and effective leadership and organizational practices;After reading the case study, create a leadership plan. In creating the leadership plan, discuss the daughter and father in terms of the following required elements;Leadership role;Leader as individual;Social architect;Change agent;Father as a manager with short-term goal orientation;Daughter as a leader with long-term goal orientation;Relationship builder;How does a moral compass give direction to the implementation of a vision and contribute to the success and sustainability of the company?;Required Formatting of the Final Project;This report should be double spaced, 12-point font, and six to eight pages in length excluding the title page and reference page;Title page with your name, the course name, the date, and instructor?s name;This paper is to be written in the third person. There should be no words in the paper such as ?I and we,?;Use headings;Writing should be clear and concise;Use APA formatting for in-text citations and reference page. You are expected to paraphrase and not use quotes. Deductions will be taken when quotes are used and found to be unnecessary;Use outside credible sources;Submit the paper in the Assignment Folder.;Due Date;Oct 12, 2014 11:59 PM;Hide Rubrics;Rubric Name: Written Assignment (35%);Criteria Outstanding Superior Good Substandard Failure;Critical Thinking/Reasoning 12.25 points;demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking, is consistent in accurately interpreting questions && material;provides solid assumptions, reasoning && claims;thorough analysis & evaluation with sound conclusions;10.41 points;shows good critical thinking, accurately interprets most questions && material;usually identifies relevant arguments/reasoning/claims, offers good analysis & evaluation with fairly sound conclusions;9.19 points;shows occasional critical thinking, questions & material is at times accurately interpreted, arguments/reasoning/claims are occasionally explained, offers fair analysis & evaluation with a conclusion;7.96 points;shows little critical thinking, misinterprets questions or material, ignores or superficially evaluates, justifies little and seldom explains reasoning, draws unwarranted conclusions;6.74 points;lacks critical thinking consistently offers biased interpretations, ignores or superficially evaluates, argues using poor reasoning, and/or unwarranted claims;Application of Concepts/Development 12.25 points;arguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from the readings/experience, ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts;10.41 points;arguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content, ideas presented demonstrate student?s understanding of the material and concepts;9.19 points;arguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views than on position grounded in the readings of material or external sources of material;7.96 points;arguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated, student may resort to ad hominem attacks on the author instead of making meaningful application of the material;6.74 points;a meaningful attempt to explain or support ideas does not exist;Attention to Instructions 5.25 points;demonstrated full understanding of requirements responded to each aspect of assignment;4.46 points;demonstrated understanding of requirements, missed one minor aspect of assignment;3.94 points;demonstrated some understanding of requirements, missed a key element or two minor aspects of assignment;3.41 points;failed to show a firm understanding of requirement, missed two key elements or several minor aspects of assignment;2.89 points;did not demonstrate understanding of assignment requirements;Clarity, including grammar 3.5 points;writing is clear and easy to follow, grammar and spelling are all correct, formatting gives a professional look and adds to readability;2.98 points;most ideas are presented clearly, occasional spelling and/or grammar issues;2.63 points;wordy, some points require rereading to understand fully, more than an occasional spelling and/or grammar;2.28 points;unclear and difficult to understand, frequent spelling and grammar issues;1.93 points;largely incomprehensible writing/poorly written in terms of mechanics and structure;Adherence to APA Style (6th ed.) 1.75 points;no APA style errors;1.49 points;attempts in-text citation and reference list but 1 or 2 APA style errors are present;1.31 points;attempts in-text citation and reference list, APA style errors are present, inconsistencies in citation usage can be found throughout the document;1.14 points;attempts either in-text citation or reference list but omits the other;0.96 points;no attempt at APA style;Overall Score Outstanding;31.5 or more Superior;28 or more Good;24.5 or more Substandard;21 or more Failure;0 or more;Submit Files

 

Paper#20289 | Written in 18-Jul-2015

Price : $54
SiteLock