Description of this paper

POST BUS204 all units discussions

Description

solution


Question

A MINIMUM of 1 original post -- answering the question completely -- and 2 quality student reply posts is expected. Discussion grades will be based upon BOTH the quality and quantity of posts. Simple statements like 'good job' or " I agree' without additional substantive discussion are NOT considered quality reply posts.;WARNING: Do NOT 'copy and paste' or 'paraphrase' excessively another student's original answer. This is a form of plagiarism and will NOT be tolerated. You may refer to another student's work in your student reply posts if proper credit is given to the original poster / student.;You have read the copy of the U.S. Constitution I posted in the Unit.;Post in this Forum as follows;1. Provide an example of any one provision (something that is written) in the Constitution that is NOT clear (ambiguous). Explain why it is not clear.;2. Comment on classmate postings.;Forum 2;A MINIMUM of 1 original post -- answering the question completely -- and 2 quality student reply posts is expected. Discussion grades will be based upon BOTH the quality and quantity of posts. Simple statements like 'good job' or " I agree' without additional substantive discussion are NOT considered quality reply posts.;WARNING: Do NOT 'copy and paste' or 'paraphrase' excessively another student's original answer. This is a form of plagiarism and will NOT be tolerated. You may refer to another student's work in your student reply posts if proper credit is given to the original poster / student.;1. What are three differences you can identify between a Trial Court (refer to our Textbook) and Judge Cristina's television program? [See link provided in this unit.];2. In terms of the resolution of private disputes, what purpose does Judge Cristina serve?;3. Comment on classmate postings.;Forum 3;A MINIMUM of 1 original post -- answering the question completely -- and 2 quality student reply posts is expected. Discussion grades will be based upon BOTH the quality and quantity of posts. Simple statements like 'good job' or " I agree' without additional substantive discussion are NOT considered quality reply posts.;WARNING: Do NOT 'copy and paste' or 'paraphrase' excessively another student's original answer. This is a form of plagiarism and will NOT be tolerated. You may refer to another student's work in your student reply posts if proper credit is given to the original poster / student.;1. Do you agree or disagree with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the Kentucky v. King case (textbook, p.144)? Please explain.;A MINIMUM of 1 original post -- answering the question completely -- and 2 quality student reply posts is expected. Discussion grades will be based upon BOTH the quality and quantity of posts. Simple statements like 'good job' or " I agree' without additional substantive discussion are NOT considered quality reply posts.;WARNING: Do NOT 'copy and paste' or 'paraphrase' excessively another student's original answer. This is a form of plagiarism and will NOT be tolerated. You may refer to another student's work in your student reply posts if proper credit is given to the original poster / student.;Post in this Forum as follows;1. In your opinion, why is there a Law of Torts?;2. Do you agree or disagree with the decision in the "McDonald's Hot Coffee Case"?;(I posted a link to this Case in the Unit) Explain your opinion..;3. Comment on classmate postings.;Forum 5;A MINIMUM of 1 original post -- answering the question completely -- and 2 quality student reply posts is expected. Discussion grades will be based upon BOTH the quality and quantity of posts. Simple statements like 'good job' or " I agree' without additional substantive discussion are NOT considered quality reply posts.;WARNING: Do NOT 'copy and paste' or 'paraphrase' excessively another student's original answer. This is a form of plagiarism and will NOT be tolerated. You may refer to another student's work in your student reply posts if proper credit is given to the original poster / student.;1. Do you agree or disagree with the decision in the Lambert case (p. 319, textbook). Explain by making EXPLICIT reference to any of the principles of Contract Law (say which one(s) you are using) that are in the Chapter. Please refer to at least some principles, and cite the page number that they are on, in order to receive a satisfactory score.;2. Please comment on classmate postings.;COLLAPSE;A MINIMUM of 1 original post -- answering the question completely -- and 2 quality student reply posts is expected. Discussion grades will be based upon BOTH the quality and quantity of posts. Simple statements like 'good job' or " I agree' without additional substantive discussion are NOT considered quality reply posts.;WARNING: Do NOT 'copy and paste' or 'paraphrase' excessively another student's original answer. This is a form of plagiarism and will NOT be tolerated. You may refer to another student's work in your student reply posts if proper credit is given to the original poster / student.;Who keeps the Engagement Ring?;The Facts;Alex ("A") proposes marriage to Barbara ("B");B accepts;A gives B an engagement ring;After 6 months A and B get tired of each other;The engagement is broken off.;Question;Who keeps the ring?;1. Post your answer and explanation. Use principles you have learned in my Lecture and Text. This is not based on your opinion alone, your conclusion MUST have a basis in the Law, therefore: YOU MUST refer to the Law and legal principles (say which one(s) and where you found them PRECISELY ("in the Textbook" is not good enough);2. Comment on a classmate postings.AGAIN: Make reference to the legal principles you have learned in my Lectures, the Text and/or web based resources.YOU MUST SUPPORT YOUR ANSWER BY REFERRING TO ANY OF THESE RESOURCES, AN UNSUPPORTED ANSWER = AN AUTOMATIC "F"Note: I am not looking for the correct answer (this is NOT Law School)... I just want a coherent answer. Do your best, make an honest effort.;A MINIMUM of 1 original post -- answering the question completely -- and 2 quality student reply posts is expected. Discussion grades will be based upon BOTH the quality and quantity of posts. Simple statements like 'good job' or " I agree' without additional substantive discussion are NOT considered quality reply posts.;WARNING: Do NOT 'copy and paste' or 'paraphrase' excessively another student's original answer. This is a form of plagiarism and will NOT be tolerated. You may refer to another student's work in your student reply posts if proper credit is given to the original poster / student.;Please visit all the links I posted in Unit 7;1. In the disasters you saw in the photographs, what should the buyer have insisted upon in his/her contract with regard to risk of loss? Explain. You must refer to our textbook (specific terms and page numbers) in our answer.;2. What should the seller have tried to put in the contract? Explain. You must refer to our textbook (specific terms and page numbers) in your answer.;COLLAPSE;A MINIMUM of 1 original post -- answering the question completely -- and 2 quality student reply posts is expected. Discussion grades will be based upon BOTH the quality and quantity of posts. Simple statements like 'good job' or " I agree' without additional substantive discussion are NOT considered quality reply posts.;WARNING: Do NOT 'copy and paste' or 'paraphrase' excessively another student's original answer. This is a form of plagiarism and will NOT be tolerated. You may refer to another student's work in your student reply posts if proper credit is given to the original poster / student.;1. Make a Personal Statement about what you learned about Business Law in this Course and how it applies, or will apply, to you in any of your activities.;2. What was your ?Wow? moment in this Course? (e.g., something surprising, or did not know before, etc.);3. Comment on classmate postings.

 

Paper#23242 | Written in 18-Jul-2015

Price : $52
SiteLock