Details of this Paper

ResearchPaperorExerciseRubricfor the Departmentof ManagementandTechnology

Description

solution


Question

ResearchPaperorExerciseRubricfor the Departmentof ManagementandTechnology;CollegeofBusiness- Worldwide;LevelsofAchievement;Criteria;Excellent(A);Above-Average(B);Average(C);Near-Failing(D);Failing (F);Identification andAnalysisof theMain Issues/Problem;23to25points;Identifies andunderstands allof themainissues in question. Insightful,andthorough analysis of alltheissues.;21to23points;Identifies andunderstands mostof themainissuesin question. Thorough analysis of mostof the issues.;19to21points;Identifies andunderstands someof theissues in question. Superficial analysis of someof the issues.;17to19points;Identifies andunderstands fewoftheissues in question. Incomplete analysis of theissues.;0to17pointsIdentifies and understands very littleof theissuesin;question. Noanalysis ofthe issues.;Answersto ResearchQuestions;18to20points Answerstoresearch questionsareclear throughout.Connectionwith classandstudymaterialgoeswellbeyondtheobvious connections amongideas, demonstrates insightand originalthinking.;16to18points Answerstoresearch questionspresent some irrelevantinformationontopic etc.,but very little,treatment goes beyond obviousconnectionswith class andstudymaterial.;14to16points Answerstoresearch questionsarevague in places, someirrelevantor distractinginformation.;12to14points Answerstoresearch questionsareunclear and/or confusing. Treatment is very superficial, papermay be wellwrittenbut says nothing.;0to12points;Doesnot address the researchquestions. Treatment is very superficialandsays very little.;Organization andCoherence;18to20points;Uses alogical structure appropriate topaper's subject, purpose, audience, thesis,and disciplinary field. Sophisticatedtransitional sentences oftendevelop;oneidea fromtheprevious one oridentify theirlogical relations. Itguides the reader through thechainof reasoningorprogression;ofideas.;16to18points Showsalogical progressionofideasand uses fairlysophisticatedtransitionaldevices, e.g.;maymove fromaleast to a more importantidea. Some logicallinksmay befaulty, buteachparagraph clearly relates to paper's centralidea.;14to16points;May list ideas orarrange themrandomlyrather than usingany evident logical structure. May use transitions,but they are likelytobesequential(first, second, third)rather than logic-based.Whileeach paragraphmay relateto centralidea,logic is not alwaysclear. Paragraphs have topic sentencesbutmaybeoverly general,and arrangementof sentenceswithinparagraphs may;lackcoherence.;12to14points May haverandom organization,lackinginternalparagraph;coherenceandusingfeworinappropriate transitions. Paragraphs may lack topic;sentences ormainideas,or;maybe toogeneral or toospecific to beeffective. Paragraphs may notall relate topaper's thesis.;0to12pointsAbsent of any kindof organization.Lacks paragraph topic sentenceandtransitions between paragraphs. Paragraphsdonot relate tothepaper's thesis.;mgmt-ug_research_paper_exercise_rubric_v2_2013;Linksto Course Readingsand Additional Research;18to20points;Excellentresearchinto theissueswithclearly documentedlinks to class (and/oroutside)readings. Muchmore thantheminimumrequired,effort to explore topicexceeds expectations, useof primary andsecondary sources, allinformation meets quality criteria. Sources interspersedwith writer'sownanalysisorsynthesis,quotesareless than10% of paper,good useofsummary and;paraphrase,allsourcesare documented,1-3minor errors(suchas incorrect;punctuation).;16to18points Goodresearchand documentedlinks tothematerialread. Slightly morethantheminimum required,effort toensure breadthanddepth, possiblynoprimary sources, allinformation meets quality criteria. Sources interspersedwith writer'sownwork,quotes areless than20% of paper,gooduseofsummary andparaphrase, allsources are documented,4-6minor errors(suchas incorrect punctuation).;14to16points Limitedresearchand documentedlinks toany readings. At least theminimumrequired, reasonablebreadthand depthof exploration,1-2 sourceslack quality criteria (i.e.,Wikipedia). 1-2 instances of stringingsourcereferences togetherwithlittleof the writer's;ownwork,quotes are25%;ormoreof paper,1-2 citationsmissingorwith majorerrors (ex:authors missingorincorrect).;12to14points Incompleteresearchandlinks to any readings.Less than theminimumrequired, orprovidingonly surface coverage, most sourceslack quality criteria. More than2instances of;stringingsourcereferences, quotesare40%ormoreof paper,OR paperincludes fewreferences tosources;3-4 citations missingorwith majorerrors.;0to12pointsProvidedno referencesorsupport ofanalysis. Veryfewsources, noattempt;toexplorevarious points ofview,all sourceslack quality criteriatotal.No references to sources, OR thereis evidenceof plagiarism,5ormore citationsmissingorwithmajorerrors.;Style, Mechanics,and Format;13to15points Chooseswordsfortheir precisemeaninganduses anappropriatelevelofspecificity. Sentencestyle fitsaudienceandpurpose.Sentences clearly structuredandcarefully focused. Almostentirely freeof spelling, punctuation,and grammaticalerrors. Accurately userequiredformattingstyleandproper referencing;11to12points Generally uses words accuratelyandeffectively, but may betoogeneral. Sentencesgenerallyclear, structured, and focused, though somemaybe awkwardorineffective.May containafewerrors, whichmayannoy the readerbutnot impede understanding. Accurately userequired formattingstyleandproper referencing;9to10points;Uses relatively vagueand generalwords, may use someinappropriate language.Sentence?s structuregenerallycorrect, butsentences may bewordy,unfocused, repetitive,orconfusing. Usually contains several mechanicalerrors,which maytemporarilyconfuse thereaderbutnotimpede theoverall understanding. Accurately userequiredformattingstyleandproper referencingwith few exceptions;7to8points;Tends tobeingvague and abstract, orvery personal and specific. Usually contains severalawkward orungrammaticalsentences, sentence structureis simpleormonotonous. Usually containseithermanymechanicalerrors orafewimportant errorsthatblock thereader'sunderstanding andabilitytoseeconnections betweenthoughts. Accurately use required formattingstyle;andproper referencingwith several exceptions;0to6points Misuseofwords throughout. Awkward sentences throughout.Difficult;toattachathought process. Poorly punctuated;misspelledwords;grammatically abusive.Failtouse required formattingstyleandproper referencing;mgmt-ug_research_paper_exercise_rubric_v2_2013

 

Paper#25286 | Written in 18-Jul-2015

Price : $34
SiteLock