You are the independent human resource consultant hired by Teddy's supplies to help explain to the company what the case against them entail. You have gleaned the facts from your investigations into the situation to date. you have never talked with Virginia Pollard. The case is currently in appeals stage and the company executives have some questions for you. Answer using the most legal information you can find.;1. teddy's Supplies CeO has aked you to advise him of the facts of the case and your opinion of the potential liability Write a memo that states your view of wether the company is exposed to liability on all issues you feel are in play. Include in your memo any laws that apply and any precedent cases either for or aginst teddy's case that impact liability. Include your opinion of the worst case of damages the company may have to pay to Virginia.;2. The circuit court overturned the decision of the NJ Human Rights Commission that had found that Pollard was the victim of sexual harassment and disparate treatment. please answer these questions.;A) Define sexual harrassment, includingboth quid pro quo and hostile enviroment harrassment. Which types do you feel Pollard was a victim of. provide a law or case to support your position. explain if you think the case applies to Pollard's case and whether you would use this case in Teddy's favor.;B) Name an appellate court case in which an employer was found liable for either quid pro quo or hostile sexual harrassment. Describe the facts of the case;c) Do you agree that Pollard was disparately treated? Why or why not?Define desparate treatment.;D) Does the existence of a sexual harrassmnet policy provide a defense to Teddy in this case. why or why not? include the name and citation of at least federal or state sexual harrassment case that provide precedent support to your defense statement.;3)The CEO ask you to review the sexual harrassment policy currently in placethat Virginia signed. He wants you to provide him with suggestions for changes to it. Review the policy and give three recommendations for changes, enhancements and ideas for making the policy stronger. Include your reason for the suggestions.Explain how your suggestions protect Teddy in the case. Support the recommendation with current case law.;4)How would Pollard case be impacted if her replacement had been a female? Would her case be different/ Would her damages be different/Explain.
Paper#31545 | Written in 18-Jul-2015Price : $22