1- Sam, a citizen of Tennessee, files a suit in a Tennessee state court against United Sales Corporation, a Wyoming company that does business in Tennessee. The court has original jurisdiction, which means that;a. the case is being heard for the first time.;b. the court does not have concurrent jurisdiction.;c. the court has standing.;d. the court has venue.;2-Kit loses her suit against Lou in a Minnesota state trial court. Kit appeals to the state court of appeals and loses again. Kit would appeal next to;a. a U.S. district court.;b. the Minnesota Supreme Court.;c. the United States Supreme Court.;3-The Idaho Supreme Court rules against Jiffy Mart in a case against Kwik Stop Stores, Inc. Jiffy Mart files an appeal with the United States Supreme Court. The Court does not hear the case. This;a. is a decision on the merits with value as a precedent.;b. indicates agreement with the Idaho court's decision.;d. means that the Idaho court's decision is the law in Idaho.;4-To prepare for a trial between Large Lots Development Corporation (LLDC) and MiniMansion Construction Company (MMCC), MMCC's attorney places LLDC's president under oath. A court reporter makes a record of the attorney's questions and the officer's answers. This is;b. a deposition.;c. an imposition.;d. an interrogatory.;5-During the trial phase of Fuel Corporation's suit against Gas Stations, Inc., their attorneys engage in voir dire. This is;b. the determination of the issues to be argued.;c. the litigation of the issues and arguments.;d. the selection of jurors.;6-In Restful Motel's suit against Sleepy Hotels, Inc., the jury returns a verdict in Restful's favor. Sleepy files a motion stating that even if the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to Restful, a reasonable jury should not have found in its favor. This is a motion for;a. a judgment in accordance with the verdict.;b. a judgment on the pleadings.;d. judgment n.o.v.;7-Emil wants to initiate a suit against Fast Credit Company by filing a complaint. The complaint should include;a. an explanation of the proof to be offered at trial.;c. a motion for judgment on the pleadings.;d. a statement of the grounds for the court to exercise jurisdiction.;8-Owen, in Pennsylvania, and Quik Jobs, Inc., in Maryland agree to have their dispute resolved in arbitration according to the law of Virginia. This is a ground for a court to;a. do nothing.;c. review the sufficiency of the evidence.;d. set aside the award.;9-To resolve a dispute, Amy in Boston and Chris in Denver utilize E-Solution, an online dispute resolution (ODR) service. This limits these parties' recourse to the courts;a. not at all.;b. until the ODR service has issued a decision.;d. with respect to this dispute only.
Paper#32044 | Written in 18-Jul-2015Price : $27