Description of this paper

Scenario: Loren Vranich, a doctor practicing




Scenario;Loren Vranich, a doctor practicing under the corporate name Family Health Care, PC., entered into a written employment contract to hire Dennis Winkel. The contract provided for an annual salary, insurance benefits, and other employment benefits. Another doctor, Dr. Quan, also practiced with Dr. Vranich. About nine months later, when Dr. Quan left the practice, Vranich and Winkel entered into an oral modification of their written contract whereby Winkel was to receive a higher salary and a profit-sharing bonus. During the next year, Winkel received the increased salary. However, a disagreement arose, and Winkel sued to recover the profit-sharing bonus. Under Montana lam, a written contract can be altered only in writing or by an executed oral agreement. Dr. Vranich argued that the contract could not be enforced because it was not in writing.;Questions;Does Winkel receive the profit-sharing bonus?;Did Dr. Vranich act ethically in raising the defense that the contract was not in writing?


Paper#33213 | Written in 18-Jul-2015

Price : $34