Razor Corp. agreed to purchase 100 mixers from Home Suppliers, Inc. Home is a wholesaler of small home appliances, and Razor is an appliance retailer. The contract required Home to ship the mixers to Razor by common carrier, ?FOB Home Suppliers, Inc. Loading Dock.? Under Article 2 of the UCC;A.Title to the mixers passes to Razor at the time they are delivered to the carrier, even if the goods are nonconforming.;B.Razor would have the right to reject any shipment if Home fails to notify Razor that the goods have been shipped.;C.Razor must inspect the mixers at the time of delivery or waive any defects and the right to sue for breach of contract.;D.Home must pay the freight expense associated with the shipment of the mixers to Razor.;Suggs Company agreed to sell certain goods to Barr Corporation pursuant to a written contract. No shipment or delivery date was specified in the contract. Based on these facts;A.The contract fails for indefiniteness.;B.The time for shipment must be agreed upon.;C.The time for shipment is within a reasonable time.;D.The time for shipment is within 3 months.;Yost Corp., a computer manufacturer, contracted to sell 15 computers to Ivor Corp., a computer retailer. The contract specified that delivery was to be made by truck to Ivor?s warehouse. Instead, Yost shipped the computers by rail. When Ivor claimed that Yost did not comply with the contract, Yost told Ivor that there had been a trucker?s strike when the goods were shipped. Ivor refused to pay for the computers. Under these circumstances, Ivor;A.Is obligated to pay for the computers because Yost made a valid substituted performance.;B.May return the computers and avoid paying for them because the contract was void under the theory of commercial impracticability.;C.Is obligated to pay for the computers because title to them passed to Ivor when Ivor received them.;D.May return the computers and avoid paying for them because of the way Yost delivered them.
Paper#33764 | Written in 18-Jul-2015Price : $27