Description of this paper

Case 7 - The 2009 Chrysler-Fiat Strategic Alliance part 1 and 2




Question;Case 7 - The 2009 Chrysler-Fiat Strategic AlliancePart I: What are your views of the 2009 Chrysler-Fiat strategic alliance and its future prospects in the auto industry? (100 points).Part II: Case synopsis. (75 points)Read the case carefully. Following the directions below and submit the case responses and synopsis in one document to the Dropbox by 5:30 p.m. on Sunday, CT.Part I: What are your views of the 2009 Chrysler-Fiat strategic alliance and its future prospects in the auto industry? (100 points)Guidelines: Answer the following:?Identify Chrysler-Fiat Strategic Alliance goals and discuss them by showing the advantages of the alliance. Document your ideas?Did the strategic alliance work as expected by both companies? Why and Why not? Document your thought. What were the benefits that both companies gain from the Alliance? Document your ideas with some evidence. Since the alliance was formed in 2009, can we say that the joint venture model was profitable and fulfilled the strategic alliance goals for both companies? Why and Why not?This assignment is a take home exam to allow students to demonstrate the analytical, integrative, critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Your work should reflect graduate work standing with smooth flow of ideas. Statements must always be supported by facts. Write to show what you have acquired in this Strategic Global Management course and avoid misusing the personal pronoun ?they? and the possessive pronoun ?their?. It will be preferable that you use ?it? and ?its?, respectively. Understand that deep analysis is required for these assignments.Do not just write what you want to write, but you must be able to answer specifically the question that is asked in well-organized manner following the guideline.Note: You are not limited to the ideas aforementioned but they must be shown in your discussions. I strongly recommend that all ideas borrowed must be cited to avoid to be charged with the plagiarism.Part II: Case Synopsis (75 Points)The case synopsis is not a case review, so your view or opinion will not be necessary. Identify and summarize the main points of the author(s) in a paragraph. Your case synopsis must be submitted as a single document along with your case responses in Part I.


Paper#52259 | Written in 18-Jul-2015

Price : $24