Details of this Paper

POST BUS204 Unit 3 and 4 discussions

Description

solution


Question

Question;Forum 3A MINIMUM of 1 original post -- answering the question completely -- and 2 quality student reply posts is expected. Discussion grades will be based upon BOTH the quality and quantity of posts. Simple statements like 'good job' or " I agree' without additional substantive discussion are NOT considered quality reply posts.WARNING: Do NOT 'copy and paste' or 'paraphrase' excessively another student's original answer. This is a form of plagiarism and will NOT be tolerated. You may refer to another student's work in your student reply posts if proper credit is given to the original poster / student.1. Do you agree or disagree with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the Kentucky v. King case (textbook, p.144)? Please explain.A MINIMUM of 1 original post -- answering the question completely -- and 2 quality student reply posts is expected. Discussion grades will be based upon BOTH the quality and quantity of posts. Simple statements like 'good job' or " I agree' without additional substantive discussion are NOT considered quality reply posts.WARNING: Do NOT 'copy and paste' or 'paraphrase' excessively another student's original answer. This is a form of plagiarism and will NOT be tolerated. You may refer to another student's work in your student reply posts if proper credit is given to the original poster / student.Post in this Forum as follows:1. In your opinion, why is there a Law of Torts?2. Do you agree or disagree with the decision in the "McDonald's Hot Coffee Case"?(I posted a link to this Case in the Unit) Explain your opinion..3. Comment on classmate postings.

 

Paper#53426 | Written in 18-Jul-2015

Price : $19
SiteLock