Description of this paper

ResearchPaperorExerciseRubricfor the Departmentof ManagementandTechnology

Description

solution


Question

Question;ResearchPaperorExerciseRubricfor;the;Departmentof;ManagementandTechnology;CollegeofBusiness-;Worldwide;LevelsofAchievement;Criteria;Excellent(A);Above-Average(B);Average(C);Near-Failing(D);Failing (F);Identification andAnalysisof;theMain Issues/Problem;23to25points;Identifies;andunderstands allof;themainissues;in question. Insightful,andthorough;analysis of alltheissues.;21to23points;Identifies;andunderstands mostof;themainissuesin question.;Thorough analysis;of mostof;the;issues.;19to21points;Identifies;andunderstands someof;theissues in question.;Superficial;analysis of someof;the;issues.;17to19points;Identifies;andunderstands fewoftheissues;in question. Incomplete;analysis of theissues.;0to17pointsIdentifies;and understands very littleof theissuesin;question. Noanalysis;ofthe issues.;Answersto;ResearchQuestions;18to20points;Answerstoresearch;questionsareclear;throughout.Connectionwith classandstudymaterialgoeswellbeyondtheobvious;connections amongideas;demonstrates insightand originalthinking.;16to18points;Answerstoresearch questionspresent;some irrelevantinformationontopic etc.,but;very little,treatment goes;beyond obviousconnectionswith class andstudymaterial.;14to16points;Answerstoresearch questionsarevague;in places, someirrelevantor distractinginformation.;12to14points;Answerstoresearch questionsareunclear;and/or confusing.;Treatment is very superficial, papermay be;wellwrittenbut;says;nothing.;0to12points;Doesnot address;the;researchquestions. Treatment;is very superficialandsays very;little.;Organization;andCoherence;18to20points;Uses alogical structure;appropriate topaper's;subject;purpose, audience, thesis,and disciplinary;field. Sophisticatedtransitional;sentences oftendevelop;oneidea fromtheprevious one;oridentify theirlogical relations.;Itguides;the;reader through;thechainof reasoningorprogression;ofideas.;16to18points;Showsalogical progressionofideasand uses fairlysophisticatedtransitionaldevices;e.g.;maymove fromaleast;to;a more importantidea.;Some logicallinksmay befaulty, buteachparagraph clearly relates;to;paper's centralidea.;14to16points;May list ideas orarrange;themrandomlyrather;than;usingany evident logical;structure. May use transitions,but;they;are likelytobesequential(first, second, third)rather than;logic-based.Whileeach;paragraphmay relateto;centralidea,logic is not;alwaysclear.;Paragraphs;have topic sentencesbutmaybeoverly;general,and arrangementof;sentenceswithinparagraphs;may;lackcoherence.;12to14points;May haverandom organization,lackinginternalparagraph;coherenceandusingfeworinappropriate transitions.;Paragraphs;may;lack topic;sentences ormainideas,or;maybe toogeneral;or toospecific;to;beeffective. Paragraphs may notall;relate topaper's thesis.;0to12pointsAbsent of any;kindof organization.Lacks paragraph topic;sentenceandtransitions;between paragraphs. Paragraphsdonot;relate tothepaper's thesis.;mgmt-ug_research_paper_exercise_rubric_v2_2013;Linksto Course;Readingsand Additional Research;18to20points;Excellentresearchinto theissueswithclearly documentedlinks;to;class (and/oroutside)readings. Muchmore thantheminimumrequired,effort to;explore topicexceeds;expectations;useof;primary andsecondary sources;allinformation;meets quality;criteria.;Sources interspersedwith;writer'sownanalysisorsynthesis,quotesareless;than10%;of paper,good useofsummary and;paraphrase,allsourcesare;documented,1-3minor errors(suchas incorrect;punctuation).;16to18points;Goodresearchand documentedlinks tothematerialread.;Slightly morethantheminimum required,effort toensure;breadthanddepth, possiblynoprimary sources;allinformation;meets quality;criteria.;Sources interspersedwith;writer'sownwork,quotes areless;than20%;of paper,gooduseofsummary andparaphrase, allsources;are documented,4-6minor;errors(suchas;incorrect punctuation).;14to16points;Limitedresearchand;documentedlinks toany;readings. At;least theminimumrequired, reasonablebreadthand depthof;exploration,1-2;sourceslack quality;criteria (i.e.,Wikipedia). 1-2;instances of;stringingsourcereferences togetherwithlittleof;the;writer's;ownwork,quotes;are25%;ormoreof paper,1-2;citationsmissingorwith;majorerrors;(ex:authors missingorincorrect).;12to14points;Incompleteresearchandlinks;to;any readings.Less;than theminimumrequired;orprovidingonly surface;coverage;most sourceslack;quality criteria.;More;than2instances;of;stringingsourcereferences;quotesare40%ormoreof;paper,OR paperincludes;fewreferences tosources;3-4 citations missingorwith majorerrors.;0to12pointsProvidedno;referencesorsupport;ofanalysis.;Veryfewsources;noattempt;toexplorevarious;points ofview,all;sourceslack quality;criteriatotal.No;references;to sources, OR thereis;evidenceof plagiarism,5ormore citationsmissingorwithmajorerrors.;Style, Mechanics,and;Format;13to15points;Chooseswordsfortheir;precisemeaninganduses;anappropriatelevelofspecificity. Sentencestyle fitsaudienceandpurpose.Sentences clearly structuredandcarefully focused. Almostentirely freeof spelling, punctuation,and;grammaticalerrors. Accurately;userequiredformattingstyleandproper referencing;11to12points;Generally uses words accuratelyandeffectively;but may betoogeneral.;Sentencesgenerallyclear, structured;and focused, though;somemaybe awkwardorineffective.May containafewerrors;whichmayannoy;the;readerbutnot impede;understanding.;Accurately;userequired formattingstyleandproper referencing;9to10points;Uses relatively;vagueand generalwords;may;use;someinappropriate language.Sentence?s structuregenerallycorrect, butsentences;may bewordy,unfocused, repetitive,orconfusing.;Usually;contains;several;mechanicalerrors,which;maytemporarilyconfuse;thereaderbutnotimpede;theoverall;understanding.;Accurately;userequiredformattingstyleandproper referencingwith few exceptions;7to8points;Tends tobeingvague;and abstract, orvery;personal and specific. Usually contains;severalawkward;orungrammaticalsentences;sentence;structureis simpleormonotonous.;Usually containseithermanymechanicalerrors;orafewimportant errorsthatblock;thereader'sunderstanding;andabilitytoseeconnections;betweenthoughts. Accurately use required formattingstyle;andproper referencingwith several;exceptions;0to6points;Misuseofwords;throughout. Awkward sentences throughout.Difficult;toattachathought;process. Poorly;punctuated;misspelledwords;grammatically;abusive.Failtouse required formattingstyleandproper referencing;mgmt-ug_research_paper_exercise_rubric_v2_2013

 

Paper#53758 | Written in 18-Jul-2015

Price : $19
SiteLock