Details of this Paper

CIS-555 week 2 discussions




CIS-555 WEEK2 DESCUSSION1;Risk Management" Please respond to the following;From the e-Activity, suppose that you were the engineer that designed this type of car and you were thinking about operational risk management. Determine the types of risk, product-related or process-related, that you would consider when it comes to the operation of the car in public parking spaces. Defend why you would consider this type of risk.;Imagine that you have been contracted to work on a given project for which you have elicited requirements from stakeholders. However, there are inconsistencies in the documentation you were given, incomplete descriptions of processes, and interviewees have given you conflicting information. Propose a solution to resolve these inconsistencies and conflicting information using techniques discussed in the textbook.;DISCUSSION2 "Documentation through Diagrams" Please respond to the following;Imagine that you have been working on a project to design and build a given system. You have completed the elicitation and evaluation phases and now you need to specify and document the system-to-be. Suppose you have decided to use diagrammatic notations for the specification and documentation. Your options are to use context diagrams or frame diagrams. Evaluate each type of diagram and select the one you feel is the best fit. Provide a rationale.;Compare Entity-Relationship (ER) diagrams, Structured Analysis and Design Technique (SADT) diagrams, data flow diagrams (DFD), and Unified Modeling Language (UML) use cases. Determine which diagram you are most likely to use for your system documentation. Provide a rationale.;PLEASE provide sources and references;E Activity:;BOOK;Van Lamsweerde, A. (2009). Requirements engineering: From system goals to UML models to software;specifications. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.


Paper#65262 | Written in 18-Jul-2015

Price : $22